#general
Thread
Hi folks, I could really use another set of eyes (or more) to check the page of our content marketing agency. It’s small and we’re always looking for ways to improve. I could really use your feedback.
Any information you think we should include?
Are we clearly conveying our message/services?
Really, anything y’all can spot—I’d love to hear. Thanks so much! This is a big leap and it’s scary but definitely so much better than a 9-5 for me.
Looks really good.
A couple of notes:
1. The rates section doesn’t show any rates. Either show them or remove ‘rates’ if you don’t want to show them.
2. You mention Phil Knight and other people but not the companies they represent. I know Phil Knight is Nike, but I don’t know the others. The point may be lost if we don’t know the companies they represent.
3. I’d put the fact you’ve written for VICE, Shutterstock and Zapier on the first or second ‘page’.
4. I’d probably go into a bit more detail of what you actually do. I always feel storytelling is a bit vague, in terms of being a client, what does it actually mean I’m getting for my money? The site mentions you specialize in long-form, then mentions blogs, thought-leadership, interviews, content strategy, social media - then has a section on blogs (and digital mags). I think this all needs to be aligned around long-form and flow better; what does it include? And why is it good and worthwhile doing for clients? And then, why you?
Good luck with your leap! 👍
"Phil Knight and Bill Bowerman did not just wake up one day and ~thought~ think..."
I'd echo Brandon's point about the light text vs background color. Not an issue for me personally, but from an accessibility pov it could be an issue for some.
Also echo Ben's point about more prominent social proof.
Aahhh… tysm for the clear and detailed feedback, folks! 🙏